Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery
University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine
Active Staff
Surgical Service: Plastic Surgery
University Hospital
Birmingham, Alabama
All too often symptoms 5dp5dt fet purchase 60 caps mentat free shipping, in agricultural debates the challenge of sustainability of farming systems is still essentially reduced to the identification of "good practices" treatment group purchase mentat 60caps line, as if it was possible to identify a few magic bullet solutions that would be independent from the environment to which they apply and could be disseminated following top-down approaches for achieving sustainability medications may be administered in which of the following ways generic 60caps mentat. However medicine 752 trusted mentat 60 caps, agricultural sustainability is not about intrinsic characteristics of a few magic bullet solutions that are divorced from local contexts and can be disseminated following top-down approaches. It relies on the quality of complex interactions that result from an entire package, adequate combination of various practices whose operationalization in particular circumstances will necessarily have to change depending on each context, since each environment has its own characteristics and conditions to achieve sustainability. Depending on how it is concretely applied and completed or not by other practices, one particular technique. As an agricultural approach, agroecology could be defined as a holistic transition process aiming to make agriculture economically, ecologically and socially more sustainable by realizing to further degree agroecological principles (understood as those on which sustainability depends, as theorized by agroecology as a science). As a process of transition towards more sustainable agricultural systems, agroecology consists therefore essentially in designing and applying an adequate strategy for managing the transition, one that can improve sustainability in the particular context considered, through means that are adapted to local conditions. Designing such strategy requires meeting certain conditions, including: Proceeding to a comprehensive diagnosis of sustainability challenges and conditions specific to the given context. This notably means the following: All relevant aspects of sustainability, whether linked to food security, environmental protection, and/or community well-being, must be taken into account, recognizing the multi-functionality of agriculture; All human and environmental constraints, and the ways through which those elements interact with each other, as well as all assets (natural, social, human, physical and financial) locally available, must be identified; Expected benefits in the short, medium and long term must be defined; the need to go beyond the level of the plot or the farming system, as well as to thinking in terms of collective actions, thus requiring coordination between different actors. Indeed, realizing agroecological principles consists primarily in mimicking natural processes, thus creating beneficial biological interactions and synergies among the components of the agroecosystem. It must notably lead to minimize the use of non-renewable inputs that cause harm to the environment or to the health of farmers and consumers. It rather seeks to reduce the use of all off-farm inputs (chemical or biological) to an absolute minimum; Ensuring a farmer-led, bottom-up approach. These conditions are all essential variables to take into account for optimizing the chances to find the best possible context-specific solutions for improving sustainability in the particular context considered. As such, instead of looking primarily on techniques, agroecology rather precisely invites us to focus on the coherence / quality of the transition process itself for achieving greater sustainability. Moreover, this would minimize trade-off in the context considered, since the various priority sustainability challenges, in such a process, will have been properly identified. On the other hand, neglecting the importance of the transition process itself by focusing too quickly and narrowly on practices, at best leads to sub-optimal solutions, and at worst to further increase the sustainability crisis. In synthesis, as agroecology teaches us, ensuring a coherent transition process is more important for achieving greater sustainability (through ad how context-specific solutions) than focusing too quickly on techniques. While the draft report includes some consideration of the importance of the transition process itself through its section 4. And it could do so by building on / taking useful inspiration from agroecology as a science and as a holistic agricultural approach. Agroecology as a major gap in the draft report As mentioned in the introduction of this document, agroecology is almost completely absent of the report, clearly underestimating its importance and relevance for meeting sustainability challenges of agricultural and food systems. Maybe this is partially due to a misconception / misunderstanding of what "agroecology" or "agroecological approaches" is / are. Clarifying the concept Agroecology is far from being one set, or even a few sets, of nice agricultural practices which could substantially help increase agricultural sustainability but only in a few very specific, limited contexts. It is a federative concept of actions, intermediate between the following three key dimensions: agroecology as a scientific discipline; agroecology a holistic agricultural (and increasingly food systems) approach; and agroecology as a social/political movement. In short: As a scientific discipline, it is basically the science of sustainable agriculture, and increasingly food systems as a whole. Originally based on the re-discovery of traditional small-scale farming systems, as mentioned above the practice of this scientific discipline has allowed and is further allowing the theorization of the key conditions to which sustainability can be increased. As a science, agroecology represents the best effort ever made to understand how sustainability works, at which conditions it can be improved. This is a big added value compared to other "sustainable agricultural approaches", such as "sustainable intensification" or "climate smart agriculture", which per se are not scientifically grounded; As an agricultural approach (and the approach tends to be increasingly expanded to food systems as a whole), agroecology can be defined as a holistic transition process aiming to make agriculture economically, ecologically and socially more sustainable by realizing to further agroecological principles, through multiple context-specific combinations of strategies and practices that are designed, applied and managed primarily by farmers themselves. It is more a kind of broad methodology to guide us for achieving greater sustainability. One very important element to understand in this regard is the fact that this methodology is basically applicable in all contexts, since there will be always some room of manoeuvre for improving sustainability (or mitigating negative externalities) in any given context. In other words, the so-called "agroecological principles" have universal applicability. As mentioned above, for more information on what agroecology is, see for example Oxfam-Solidarity, op. The analysis is based on a comprehensive list of credible bibliographic resources. There are a number of very good reasons why agroecology / agroecological should be mainstreamed in the report or at least have a strong specific focus in the report (including it terms of recommendations): Firstly, as demonstrated by a massive body of evidence, it can make a huge contribution to achieving food security and nutrition, and the realization of the Right to Adequate Food, as well as to achieving other key sustainability challenges of today and the future: Contributing to food security and nutrition, and the realization of the Right to Adequate Food: (1) by enhancing yields / land productivity substantially (availability of food) through solution that are globally labour-intensive while allowing a progressive increase of the productivity per worker in countries whose populations largely depend on agriculture for their livelihoods (see related developments in answer to question 5 above); (2) by boosting urban agriculture (availability of food); (3) by reducing poverty (accessibility of food); and by ensuring the adequate character of food (adequacy of food); Contributing to water security and the realization of the Right to W ater and Sanitation => though improving water use efficiency or productivity. This also in return contributes to food security and nutrition and the realization of the Right to Adequate Food (in particular thanks to the significant yields / land productivity increases resulting from higher water productivity and its expected positive economic impacts); Preserving biodiversity and natural resources. The increase of resilience through agroecological transitions results from: (1) increasing the level of biodiversity; (2) building healthier soils; (3) improving water management and water harvesting in rainfed regions; and (4) optimizing yields / land productivity increases. Those 4 dimensions / levers can be considered as key conditions for better adapting agriculture to climate shocks. As to the mitigation challenge, in particular, transitioning industrial agriculture to more agroecological farming systems could significantly contribute to mitigation, since agroecological farming is highly efficient in sequestering carbon. More importantly, scaling-out and up agroecological transition processes would not only allow addressing the mitigation challenge of the agricultural sector. Increased control of peasants also builds on the bottom-up and farmer-led methods privileged for designing and managing agroecological transition processes, as illustrated by the CaC (campesino-a-campesino - farmer-tofarmer) methodology. Such approaches allow peasants to take responsibility and control over transition processes, enabling them to share, discuss and decide on their own what they want to do. Ownership of processes by farmers depends importantly on the inherent flexibility available to them for trying out the practices on their own farms, adapting and innovating for addressing their specific problems with available resources. Secondly, there is no other scientifically grounded approach which allows developing context- specific solutions, avoiding a top-down, standardized one-size-fits-all approach. There is other approach capable of taking that much into account the specificities of each local context. This is due to what agroecology is fundamentally in terms of a holistic agricultural (and increasingly food systems) transition process or approach, based on the best effort ever made to understand how to achieve greater sustainability. In that sense, agroecology is very inclusive, allowing identifying ways to transition extremely diverse agricultural (and food) systems into more sustainable ones, primarily through the identification of the available room of manoeuver to do so given the specific agronomic, pedo-climatic, social, economical, cultural assets and constraints in each context. Thirdly, as already explained above (see our answer to question 2), despite the massive body of evidence demonstrating the relevance of agroecology for addressing sustainability challenges today and in the future, it remains poorly supported, while on the other hand reinvestment efforts in agriculture since 2008 still continue to further benefit to the Green Revolution style agriculture that has led us to the current agricultural and food crisis. Although there are debates as to the centrality of agroecology for addressing sustainability challenges of agricultural and food systems. Here is a short selection of just 10 useful resources for more information on agroecology and for better taking stock of its importance for achieving greater sustainability: Report of the International Forum for Agroecology, Nyꭩni Center, Sꭩngu鬠Mali, 24-27 February 2015, including the Declaration of Nyꭩni 2015. However, this differentiation is not strongly enough included in the recommendations. In order, to provide evidence based guidance, the recommendations need to be specific for the different types and size of farming. There is still room to be more prescriptive and specific in the recommendations and underline more precisely how they should be implemented and prioritized. It would be also helpful to make an estimate on how much it could cost the implementation of this agenda Comments on recommendations on cross-cutting issues: Consistent with our previous comments on agroecology, a key recommendation that should be included is the need to scale up agroecological approaches. This would require policy changes and increase investments to put in place adequate supporting measures and policy environment. However, unless we missed it, they are not discussed in the rest of the report at all. If they are included in the recommendations they should be discussed in the report and it should be illustrated how and in which conditions (who should be involved, how to ensure they do no harm, benchmarks, etc. As mentioned above (see our related point in our answer to question 5 above), the active participation of small-scale producers, and especially women, must be ensured at local, regional (subnational), national and international levels. Real participation is crucial to ensure that all relevant policies are truly responsive of the needs of vulnerable groups and for empowering them. Comments on the recommendations on the social pillar: It should be much clearer the need to ensure access to all productive resources (land, water, other natural resources, as well as seeds) for all small scale food producers and ensure that the principle of Free Prior and Informed Consent is respected as a right for Indigenous Peoples and more broadly for all affected communities; the issue of living income is absent. May be worth to have a specific recommendation focusing on agricultural workers; There should be language for achieving gender equity / empowering women. Among others women should be systematically involved in all relevant decision making processes for transitioning processes aiming at achieving greater sustainability of agricultural and food systems.
Diseases
Adrenal gland hypofunction
Landy Donnai syndrome
Nerve sheath neoplasm
Giant congenital nevi
Patterson Lowry syndrome
Noonan like syndrome
Hygroma cervical
Pharmacophobia
Contractural arachnodactyly
Powell Buist Stenzel syndrome
Results: In a preliminary analysis medications j tube discount mentat 60 caps with mastercard, average drinks per day during a typical week prior to most recent abstinence and during a week of heaviest drinking were 10 medications and pregnancy mentat 60 caps lowest price. Subjects with type A pain had higher drinking amounts and total drinks treatment xeroderma pigmentosum mentat 60caps with visa, but a trend toward fewer days suggesting more binge patterning (p=0 symptoms graves disease buy mentat 60caps low price. Purpose: Currently available preclinical models for drug testing are not optimal due to the high-passage commercially obtained cell lines and xenografts established from these lines. Cy- 246 Poster Abstracts ͠Monday, October 6 totoxic agent activity against these xenografted neoplasms only modestly correlates with clinical acitivity. We aimed to determine if direct pancreatic tumor xenografting preserved their histologic grade and genotypic features despite serial passages, thereby allowing it to be used as a model for preclinical drug testing. Methods: Surgical specimens from 15 consecutive pancreatic cancer patients (pts) who underwent pancreatectomy from 1996-2002 were xenografted and expanded in successive groups of nude mice to develop cohorts of tumor-bearing mice. Vimentin did not stain any of the tumors, except in one surgical specimen, however the staining was lost in the serial passages. Conclusion: Nearly all of the xenografted tumors maintain the same histological grade through passages. Further studies in larger numbers may validate this model for preclinical drug testing. Other significant predictors included male gender, history of heavy alcohol use, and history of acute pancreatitis. No significant interactions were found between smoking and the other variables (including alcohol). All 10 were women, compared to 82/113 (70%) of all the relatives screened (exact p=0. Of the 113 participants who were screened, 65 never smoked, 41 smoked but quit, and 7 were current smokers. Years since quitting smoking and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke did not differ substantially in the two groups. Methods: From 2005, patients with swelling of the lachrymal grand or the salivary gland were advised to visit department of gastoroenterology after denial to malignancies. Firstly visiting department was ophthalmology: 2 (lacrimal gland swelling), otolaryngology: 1 (salivary gland swelling), clinical immunology: 1 (suspicion of autoimmune disease), gastroenterological surgery: 2 (suspicion of pancreatic cancer), gastroenterology: 5 (obstructive jaundice and/or abdominal pain, and hyperamylasemia), and others: 2 patients (accidentally detected hyperamylasemia with no sympton). Those with extrapancreatic disease showed the tendency toward a high serum IgG and IgG4 levels compared to those without. Advanced pancreatic disease was confirmed by radiology, pathology and/or endoscopic imaging. Pancreas exocrine insufficiency patients are at increased risk for malnutrition 2. Inconsistent interpretations may result from methodologic limitations in prior studies. These patients were pair-matched to no-cholecystectomy patients based on age, sex, and inpatient vs outpatient status. Proximal were larger than distal measurements for post-cholecystectomy (difference=1. Clinicians should consider this when deciding whether to pursue additional costly or invasive diagnostic evaluations for post-cholecystectomy patients. Methods: A retrospective review of patients who were referred to our pancreatico-biliary clinic from 12/06-12/07 was performed. A single observer measured and recorded all measurements, and the mean for pancreatic duct diameter change, time to peak change, and duodenal filling were calculated. Though there was a trend towards a longer time to maximal pancreatic duct dilation and lower duodenal filling at peak pancreatic duct diameter in those patients with an intact native sphincter of Oddi, these results were not statistically significant. In addition, there was no difference in those patients who had only a biliary sphincterotomy compared to those with both biliary and pancreatic sphincterotomies. However, further studies are required to determine the effect of sphincterotomy on the amount of duodenal filling and the rate at which duodenal filling occurs. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the effect of pancreatic duct stent diameter on hospitalization for abdominal pain in chronic pancreatitis. A chart review was performed to identify the number of hospitalizations for abdominal pain and follow-up time for each individual. Each patient was placed into one of two groups based on the pancreatic duct stent diameter used: 1) 8. The main outcome was number of hospitalizations adjusting for varying follow-up time and controlling for age, gender, and etiology of pancreatitis using a negative binomial model. There was no statistically significant difference in population characteristics between the 8. Using a negative binomial model, the 10 French group had a statistically significant (p = 0. Prospective studies are needed to compare outcomes related to differences in pancreatic duct stent diameter in chronic pancreatitis. There was no evidence of chronic pancreatitis in any of these patients defined by ductal abnormalities and/or calcifications. Conclusion: Although there was limited follow-up, this study suggests that many patients, perhaps most patients with alcoholic acute pancreatitis may have another etiology such as gallstones. Despite a history of alcohol consumption, it remains unclear whether alcohol causes acute pancreatitis in the absence of evidence of chronic pancreatic disease at admission. In vitro, nafamostat Inhibit the pancreatic protease activities 10ͱ00 times more potently than gabexate. The remaining 197 patientsͱ14 in the gabexate group and 83 in the nafamostat groupηere analyzed. Acute pancreatitis was considered to be present if serum amylase was three times greater than the upper limits of normal in association with the onset of pancreatic pain. In details of procedures, pancreatic duct injection and stenting were performed more in gabexate group than nafamostat group (P = 0. Preventive nafamostat or gabexate use, pancreatic duct injection, cannulation time, and stenting were the factors with P < 0. Four patients treated with gabexate and three given nafamostat had adverse events such as nausea, diarrhea, and itching, all of which resolved. At the time of the initial cholangiogram, the source of the bile leak was identified in 83 patients (89. The exact source of the bile leak could not be clearly identified in the remaining 11 patients (11. Three patients had a persistent bile leak and required additional stent placement. A significant number of patients (95%) were successfully treated with a short 4 week duration of stenting. Purpose: Unlike gallstones, acute intake of alcohol is believed not to be a cause of acute pancreatitis. Based on the current accepted mechanism in which alcohol causes acute pancreatitis, chronic intake daily of over 50 grams per day over many years is expected to cause chronic damage, protein plugs, fibrosis, and/or ductal changes prior to any attack of acute pancreatitis. While many patients with acute pancreatitis attributed to alcohol have evidence of chronic pancreatitis at admission, such as exocrine insufficiency, ductal changes in the pancreas and/or calcifications, the diagnosis is often made in patients with no evidence of chronic disease. In these patients, with alcoholic acute pancreatitis, the diagnosis is made based on the absence of gallstones, a normal triglyceride level and a strong history of alcohol intake despite an otherwise normal appearing pancreas. Methods: In order to better establish whether patients with acute pancreatitis attributed to alcohol, in the absence of imaging evidence of chronic disease, are indeed due to alcohol, we performed the following study. A consecutive series of patients seen in 1998 for acute pancreatitis were studied. Results: During the study period, 165 patients were admitted with acute pancreatitis. Purpose: Identify crucial issues that may impact the quality of life in chronic pancreatitis patients to help design a tool specific for this group of patients. Exclusion criteria: Age < 18 or > 65, the presence of severe co-morbidities and non-English speaking. Patients who met the inclusion/ exclusion criteria were invited to participate in a focus group or interview sessions, based on personal preference. Both types of sessions were conducted by a group coordinator who facilitated the discussion.
Generic mentat 60 caps amex. Top 10 migraine headache symptoms And Causes Of Migraine Headache.
Data fields included medical medicine 79 order mentat 60 caps with visa, pharmacy treatment bacterial vaginosis mentat 60 caps without prescription, payroll medicine numbers purchase mentat 60caps mastercard, work absence (where available) medications post mi purchase 60 caps mentat, and demographics. Costs of hospitalization and other medical resources were taken from Bassi et al, 2004. Methods: A simple cost analysis was conducted using recommended induction and maintenance dosing regimens for each agent over a 2-year time horizon. It was assumed that the response and remission rate were the same for each agent at 60% and 40% respectively. Maintenance therapy was followed if responding to initial therapy and continued in year 2 for remitters. Results: the estimated induction cost was approximately $9,504; $5,193 and $4,934 per patient for infliximab, adalimumab and certolizumab pegol, respectively. With maintenance therapy, the 2-year expected total cost was approximately $47,520; $48,472 and $44,044 for infliximab, adalimumab and certolizumab pegol, respectively. In cohort analysis, with uptakes of 60%, 30% and 10% in year 1 and 50%, 30% and 20% in year 2 for infliximab, adalimumab and certolizumab pegol, respectively, a total budget of $76,766,506 was estimated. In a scenario without access to certolizumab pegol, the estimated total budget was $78,307,778. However these estimates are likely highly sensitive to the rates and costs of dose intensification, which were not taken into account in the model. Adverse events included Clostridium difficile colitis (6 cases) and community-acquired pneumonia (1 case), but no cases of hip fracture or vitamin B12 deficiency were identified. These results were further supported by the larger proportion of patients with a clinically favorable change from baseline in physician-rated disease activity at month 6/end of treatment in the granulated mesalamine group (78%) compared with placebo (64%; P=0. This novel formulation may deliver mesalamine to the colon with minimal systemic exposure, reduce pill burden, and increase adherence. Hospital for General Internal Medicine, ChristianAlbrechts University, Kiel, Germany; 4. Pts lost to follow-up, withdrawn or given rescue medication were treated as non-responders/remitters from that point onwards. The percentage of pts who completed assessments and achieved remission was stable throughout the study (74. Purpose: To evaluate the safety of an investigational 800 mg delayed-release oral tablet formulation of mesalamine dosed at 4. Percent change of serum creatinine from baseline to exit was similar for both dosing groups with no evidence of a dose related increase. This research was supported by an industry grant from Research funded by Shire Pharmaceuticals Inc. Purpose: To determine the efficacy of and identify patients more likely to respond to higher dose (4. However, comorbidities increased the risk of postoperative mortality and thus should be considered when comparing the risk/benefit ratio of medical versus surgical therapy. Although the Elixhauser index outperformed the Charlson/Deyo index, both indices were predictive of postoperative mortality. Purpose: Risk adjustment is employed in studies that use administrative data to evaluate outcomes such as mortality. The two most commonly applied risk adjustment measures are the Elixhauser and the Charlson/Deyo index. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to compare the mortality prediction achieved for each comorbidity index after adjusting for age, gender, insurance, and emergency admission. We used the c-statistic, an approximation to the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, as our measure of model discrimination. Farraye-Prometheus Laboratories: Speakers bureau and research support this research was supported by an industry grant from Serologic assays provided by Prometheus Laboratories. The classification of patients by clinical diagnosis and test result is given in Table 1. There is a paucity of research examining the impact of interventions to address this issue. Conclusion: A patient-support program for mesalamine is feasible in patients with ulcerative colitis in remission. Methods: Twenty-eight cases and 36 controls were enrolled during office visits to Boston Medical Center. Demographic and clinical data was entered into a database at the time of enrollment. A better understanding of the molecular pathways involved in the causation or response mechanisms of these two disorders would advance diagnostic testing and treatment of patients. This overlap of highly statistically significant biomarkers suggests a shared biology. Additional studies are necessary to determine whether these genes have a causative role or are part of a common response mechanism. Keshav - Advisory Board Member and stockholder: ChemoCentryx this research was supported by an industry grant from ChemoCentryx, Inc. Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, H𰩴al Claude Huriez, Lille, France; 2. Kamm - Consultant: Abbott, Schering-Plough, Research Support: Abbott, Schering-Plough; Dr. Hospital for General Internal Medicine, Christian Albrechts University, Kiel, Germany; 3. The safety population comprised all patients who had received 1 dose of study medication. Seven cases of a solid tumor (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) were observed: 2 cases each of rectal cancer and small intestinal cancer; and 1 case each of prostate cancer, breast cancer, and metastatic malignant melanoma. Opportunistic infections (other than tuberculosis) were reported in 3 patients: Herpes zoster, candidiasis, and esophageal candidiasis. Conclusion: To date no significant adverse outcomes has been reported in patients exposed to natalizumab during pregnancy and the spontaneous abortion rate is comparable to what is expected in the general population. However, the number of exposed patients is too low to draw any definitive conclusions and further data are needed before the safety of natalizumab in pregnancy can be established. Table: Cumulative Pregnancy Outcomes (through 23 February 2008) * One completed pregnancy resulted in two outcomes. Factors such as frequency of brushing, use of floss, use of breath freshener, visit to dentist and frequency of dental problems were considered at disease onset and at the time of filling questionnaire. There was no significant difference in these practices between the cases and controls at the time of filling of questionnaire except for the visit to dentist, which continued to be significantly more often (p=0. The frequency of bleeding gums, receding gums and dental fillings was not different between cases and controls. Further prospective studies on oral microflora are necessary to answer this question. These case reports were reviewed for maternal demographics and infant outcomes data. Results: Of the 143 reported pregnancies as of February 2008, 82 are from clinical trials, 36 are from a pregnancy registry and 25 are from post-marketing surveillance. Of the 137 prospective cases, follow-up is ongoing for 32 cases and outcomes were reported in 106 cases (Note: one completed pregnancy resulted in two outcomes of live birth). There were 55 live births out of 137 prospective pregnancies, including one premature birth. In this study we compared data with subjects with subjects with functional bowel disease and healthy controls. Estimates of the magnitude of this increased risk in the United States have not been provided for a large, diverse, community-based population. We further restricted our study population to patients with at least one year of follow-up and without prior total colectomy. Cancer incidence was standardized to the age and gender distribution of the 2000 Census population. This research was supported by an industry grant from this research was supported by a grant from Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Methods: We extracted medical and pharmacy claims from the PharMetrics Patient-Centric Database, containing data from 87 health plans in 33 states spanning the period January 2003December 2005. This research was supported by an industry grant from Grant/Research Support: Elan Biogen.
Cedoaria (Zedoary). Mentat.
Are there safety concerns?
Dosing considerations for Zedoary.
How does Zedoary work?
Colic, spasms, improving appetite and digestion, inflammation, nervous diseases, and other uses.
Devilee P, Easton D. Introduction and historical perspectives. In: Lakhani SR, Ellis IO, Schnitt SJ, Tan PH, van de Vijver MJ, eds. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Breast. Lyon: IARC Press 2012;172-173.
Franz DN, Brody A, Meyer C, et al. Mutational and radiographic analysis of pulmonary disease consistent with lymphangioleiomyomatosis and micronodular pneumocyte hyperplasia in women with tuberous sclerosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;164:661-8.
Teichman, J.M.H., Portis, A.J., Cecconi, P.P. et al. In vitro comparison of shock wave lithotripsy machines. J Urol 2000;164:1259-1264.
Paediatric Stroke Working Group. iStroke in childhood: clinical guidelines for diagnosis, management and rehabilitation.i Royal College of Physicians, November 2004, http://bookshop.rcplondon.ac.uk/contents/f98c6540-a541-4bed-837d-ef293- ac458bf.pdf. 85.
Devlin HB. Audit and the quality of clinical care. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1990;72 Suppl 1:3-14.
Warren WH, Memoli VA, Gould VE. Well differentiated and small cell neuroendocrine carcinomas of the lung. Virchows Arch B Cell Incl Mol Pathol 1988;55:299-310.
